Discovery Framework

What does omnichannel actually mean for PADI?

Omnichannel has been used a lot, and it means different things to different people

Before defining a strategy, it's worth being honest that "omnichannel" already carries several different meanings inside this conversation. Here's where it's shown up so far.

Border UX Customer Journey Readout, Apr 2026

One of three strategic pillars for PADI's modernization: "Omnichannel connections, meet divers everywhere they are." The research frames this as meeting divers in the places they already research and plan, search, Reddit, Google Maps, dive shops, rather than expecting them to start on padi.com.

Border LLC, Customer Journey Readout

Where divers actually discover new destinations and hobbies (survey data)

Source: Border UX Customer Journey Readout, 1,097 survey responses across Potential Divers, Active Divers, Members and Pros (Apr 2026).

But "omnichannel" itself has been used to mean at least four different things

Click each point to see how it's been framed so far.

Discovery questions for PADI

Rather than guess which definition of omnichannel applies, these are the questions that would pin it down. Answering these first would make everything downstream sharper.

The dive center is where omnichannel actually gets decided

Regardless of which definition of omnichannel PADI lands on, one structural fact sits underneath all of them: the dive shop, not the certifying agency, is who divers actually book with. That relationship is where the real leverage is.

Share of dive centers/instructors naming this agency as their primary certifying agency. Source: State of the Dive Industry (SOTI) survey, 2023 data.

The pattern isn't "a competitor out-digitaled PADI"

On third-party travel and booking platforms (Viator, GetYourGuide, Airbnb Experiences, liveaboard sites), it's the dive shop that gets listed and booked, not the certifying agency, for every agency including PADI. PADI is also already integrated into Dive Shop 360, the dominant dive-shop POS platform, alongside SSI and SDI. So the erosion in PADI's primary-agency share isn't PADI being out-maneuvered on some digital channel it's missing. It's shops making an ordinary switching decision (cost, curriculum, relationship) at the one point of contact that actually matters. Any omnichannel strategy that doesn't address the shop relationship directly is solving the wrong layer.

Competitive signals, for context only

This is supporting evidence, not the main story. Each of these is a data point worth knowing, not a reason to build a PADI-versus-anyone strategy.

Also reviewed and not included above: CMAS holds real share in Western Europe (13% primary-agency) but operates as a non-profit federation of national clubs, not a digital or channel-based competitor. BSAC and GUE are club-based or niche-technical and sit outside this question entirely.

A resourceable way to sequence this

However PADI answers the discovery questions above, the sequencing logic holds: score channels by whether existing people and assets can do the work, not by reach alone.

Channel tiering compass

X: incremental resource cost. Y: attribution directness. Size: diver demand signal. Click a channel to see the full read.

Tap or click any bubble. Toggle the legend to isolate a tier.